By altering these axioms mathematicians can (and have) developed different versions of mathematics.
One thing that is special about the version of mathematics that we are used to is that it allows for creating a staggering variety of useful models.
Reflecting on an experience as unsatisfactory actually makes it unsatisfactory.
NLP looks at the way in which we think and process our thoughts (Neuro), the language patterns we use (Linguistic) and our behaviours (Programming) and how these interact to have a positive (or negative) effect on us as individuals. NLP is a collection of a wide range of methods, models and strategies which help you understand how your thought process impacts on your behaviour.
Mathematicians and scientists use math to model the world by constructing mathematical objects that capture important properties of physical things (while ignoring those properties that are not relevant for the investigation).
Hence, it isn’t as though math just happens to work well for analyzing the world we live in, rather, it was specifically designed for that purpose.
Just think – if you are immersed on a family or social circle where these little unthinking gems of resignation and defeat are repeated over and again – it actually permeates your worldview and you come to see the world this way.
In the same sense, being immersed in a social environment where possibilities and potentials are explored and celebrated instead of being limited will lead to better life experiences.
Hence, from the basic useful mathematical objects, a whole complicated structure follows which contains many new ideas relating to or emanating from the original ones.
Long after most of the basic objects of math were created, attempts were made to axiomatize the subject (i.e.
It drives home a retreat and a shrinking away from taking on the challenges of life.
Instead, in the exact same situation, it would be preferable to suggest “As long as we keep doing our best, things will come our way” or “” – a similar, trite little saying but one that does not hold the defeat and resignation of the first saying.
if I have two objects in one group and I combine them with three objects in another group, then my new group has five objects, which is mimicked by 2 3=5) then it might not be considered a basic mathematical operation like it is today.